Compare
MSA compared with common machinery safety tools
Established machinery safety tools focus on risk assessment and CE documentation. MSA extends the same traceable model into process safety, validation and commissioning.
Side by side
Capability by capability.
| Capability | MSA | SafeXpert (IBF) | MYZEL (Pilz) | SISTEMA (free) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machinery risk assessment (ISO 12100) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CE documentation & technical file | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Process plant safety (IEC 61511 / LOPA) | Yes | No | No | No |
| IQ/OQ/PQ validation protocols | Yes | No | No | No |
| FAT / SAT protocol generation | Yes | No | No | No |
| Device fitness gap register | Yes | No | No | No |
| FTA · FMEA · Bowtie analysis | Yes | Partial | No | No |
| EU Machinery Regulation 2027 ready | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works offline — no cloud dependency | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Supported Partial Not supported
Comparison based on Sicher Systems’ review of publicly available product information. Product capabilities change; check with each vendor for current details. SafeXpert, MYZEL, Pilz and SISTEMA are trademarks or products of their respective owners, who are not affiliated with Sicher Systems.
Only in MSA
Where MSA goes further
Capabilities in the comparison above that only MSA provides in full.
See the difference on your own project
Bring a recent machine or process package. We’ll show you how MSA turns the same engineering inputs into certification-ready evidence.